The Manipulation of 4:43
"Do not pray intoxicated" - twisted into "drink freely between prayers." A rule that bars A from B was never a permit for A.
I. The Verse and the Claim
"O you who believe, do not observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) while intoxicated, so that you know what you are saying..." (4:43)
Some interpreters have squeezed a permission out of this prohibition: if God forbids approaching the Salat while intoxicated, then - they conclude - intoxicants must be allowed at every other hour. The inference feels clever for exactly as long as it takes to test it on any other rule of the same shape.
II. A Rule That Bars, Not a Rule That Permits
4:43 legislates one thing: intoxication disqualifies a believer from the Salat. The reason is in the verse - "so that you know what you are saying." Prayer is speech before God; a mind that does not command its own words has nothing to offer Him. Notice how singular this disqualification is: the Quran bars no sinner from the Salat. The one who has stolen, lied, even killed, must still pray - worship is a duty on believers precisely because they sin and need the connection. Intoxication alone suspends the duty, because it removes the worshiper himself; the body kneels and nobody is present in it.
Now the logic. Consider a statute: "No one may operate a school bus while intoxicated." Does the statute legalize drunkenness for everyone not currently driving a bus? Or a rule that a person under heavy sedation may not sign contracts - does it recommend sedation to everyone outside a signing? A rule of the form "A disqualifies you from B" says nothing about A's own legality; it only protects B. Whether A is itself lawful is decided by other laws. So it is here: 4:43 protects the Salat from the intoxicated mind. Whether intoxicants are lawful is decided elsewhere in the Book - and it is.
III. Where the Quran Actually Rules on Intoxicants
"O you who believe, intoxicants, and gambling, and the altars of idols, and the games of chance are abominations of the devil; you shall avoid them, that you may succeed." (5:90)
"The devil wants to provoke animosity and hatred among you through intoxicants and gambling, and to distract you from remembering GOD, and from observing the Contact Prayers (Salat). Will you then refrain?" (5:91)
The ruling verse names intoxicants an abomination of the devil, commands avoidance, and 5:91 even circles back to the Salat - the devil's goal is to distract you from it, which is exactly the harm 4:43 fences against. The two verses are one coherent law: 5:90 prohibits the devil's tool; 4:43 quarantines the prayer from anyone it has already captured. Reading 4:43 as a drinking schedule inverts a protection into a permit - and requires believing that God prohibited intoxicants in Sura 5 while licensing them in Sura 4. The Book does not contradict itself (4:82); its manipulators must.
On the claim that 5:90's "avoid" is softer than prohibition, see: The misinterpretation of 5:90.